Quantcast
Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel


Embed this content in your HTML

Search

Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Showcase


Channel Catalog



Channel Description:

Most recent forum messages

older | 1 | .... | 634 | 635 | (Page 636) | 637 | 638 | .... | 832 | newer

    0 0

    Does it have little hearts on it? Mine seems to have been misplaced.


    0 0

    I have been waiting for almost 2 months for my bo3 code and I still have not got it yet please email a code to me please asap I have been waiting for a very long time and it's ridiculous.


    0 0

    Yeas, you need to read and try to understand what YOU are posting.


    0 0

    oRLsx317o wrote:

     

    Also, sales mean nothing compared to current players.

    Really? ...... BO2 sales were massive, compared to AW. Pointing out your flawed logic, time and time again, is far too easy.

    oRLsx317o wrote:

     

    thermal M27 corner fairies that are STILL selfishly slowing the game down for their stats.

    So now you are calling people with playstyles, different than your own .... fairys? I see Im obviously talking to a child .... so this conversation is a waste of time.

     

    Your mindset is exactly what developers should not be listening to.


    0 0
  • 09/20/15--15:16: Re: No games Found
  • Thank you for your comments, I am very upset about this issue. I don't know what to do. I am very disappointed about this service support. I have not found any fix to this problem.


    0 0

    Hi Mikerowan48,

     

    We appreciate you taking the time to post.

     

    The Call of Duty: Black Ops III beta was available for Xbox One, PS4 and PC users.  The beta for Black OPs III ended in August 2015.  Activision Support

     

    Kind regards ^AH


    0 0

    iHattoriHanzo0 wrote:

     

    BrainDead6666 wrote:

     

    Nobody should waste time getting a new account and then.....

     

    Even if a player had 15 different accounts and did a detailed study of these drops with doing good, bad, and average.... I don't think it would prove anything and give the guy a headache.

     

    It's like going up against the Red Queen or winning a game of chess against Deep Blue.... ain't gonna happen.

    chess2.gifNo? You haven't seen my tools...


    0 0

    BrainDead6666 wrote:

     

    My experience has been a random one as well... However...

     

    Okay..Let's concede that SD occurrences may be randomly given out for special/individual game activity. (Those drops would be the "sympathy" drops that

    FiftyDETH was referencing.) Activities the specifics of which we do not know and cannot recreate thereby making the SD a random occurrence. I will even venture to say that a new weaker player may, even randomly, be given access to additional SD's... As oRLsx317o says are a sort of SPM thing... They are still random occurrences. The contents of those SD's would still be random, I will even grant that they may be weighted-random asQ39ESM  puts forth..

     

    If extra SD's are generated by doing bad at the game then receiving those SD's by pretending to be bad is reverse boosting and an illegal activity, thereby, skewing the random/designed nature of the drops.

     

    Getting more SD's maybe gets more chances at access to better weapons quicker than for the regular skilled players... But that's a self defeating deal just like the SIMM set-up.... The use of better weapons should raise the perceived skill of the player thereby generating them normal SD's, which seem to drop at around 1 every 45 minutes.

     

    If somebody isn't rev-boosting then they get an early gun or two or three from extra SD's as they are learning maps and the game play, whatever. If they still don't/can't do well enough to stop the SD gravy train then getting all the guns in the game probably won't matter.

     

    Nobody should waste time getting a new account and then "illegally" reverse boost on it just to prove something that is in all likelihood there.. It would just show that SD drops may drop on a different random paradigm for the new peeps...They do it with SIMM so why not SD's? And, just like all the SIMM rev-boost hate videos on youtube, the video proof that that you can screw with the rate of SD drops would not prove anything but you can cheat and video that behavior.

     

    From my experiences normal players get normal SD drop cycles.

    So you are conceding that SDs are not totally random?  Its the whole basis of the argument BTW.


    0 0

    iHattoriHanzo0 wrote:

     

    BrainDead6666 wrote:

     

    Nobody should waste time getting a new account and then.....

     

    Even if a player had 15 different accounts and did a detailed study of these drops with doing good, bad, and average.... I don't think it would prove anything and give the guy a headache.

     

    It's like going up against the Red Queen or winning a game of chess against Deep Blue.... ain't gonna happen.

    Why do you say it wouldn't prove anything?  It would and will prove that bad players get more chances at elite weapons.  Does that not bother you? 


    0 0

    Actually the exact opposite. Well, Ghosts and BO2 are different. I did not have an Xbox One at the time nor a gaming PC when Ghosts came out, and the 360 is not really mine, so I got Ghosts and BO2 after they came out. Advanced Warfare, I was totally hyped. I got one-day shipping and when I came home was super excited. Same with the games before that. Modern Warfare 3 was a huge game for me. I played that game a ton, got 10th Prestige in about 2 months I played it so much. That was really the last game that I had a lot of (real-life) friends playing. After that, I was on my own and people generally quit COD (of those who I knew). Black Ops 1, my hype was huge, got that day 1 also. Modern Warfare 2, oh I cannot even explain. WAW I have no recollection if I got that the day it came out. COD 4, no I got that a month or so after it came out. COD 3... some time I cannot remember.

     

    I was never like, "Ugh, another $60". COD was my favorite game. Heck, I was addicted. It was so much fun and I was shooting to thrill when the game came out every year. I was actually considering redoing my BO3 preorder, but realized one-day shipping costs $4 more now, so I did not do that. Basically, when friends quit playing Call of Duty, I got less into it. In fact I'll go as far as saying that having real friends to play the game with and talk to makes it 500% more fun. I find myself turn on COD and turn it off if no friends are on.


    0 0

    But I feel like BO3 is going to be one of those games like every COD where I will get addicted, but it'll be a bad addiction. Rather than the type of addiction I had in the past, where I was proud to play a lot, it'll be something more of the "ugh, what time is it? I wasted away my whole day."


    0 0

    I'll admit that I had BO2 for Wii U so I did not have any DLC, but I did not like Transit period. Now, I have played a BO2 DLC zombie map before, and I thought it was fun, but still did not match BO1 zombies.


    0 0

    Eh guess I'm off.


    0 0
  • 09/21/15--15:21: If YOU Were a COD Dev...
  • Imagine you are a COD developer. Not a very popular one. Just one who sits there, minds his own business, and codes. All the developers get called to a conference meeting. There is a box in the middle of the long desk on the 40th floor of some fancy skyscraper in New York. You are told to stop spinning in the swivel chairs. It is announced: everyone gets one slip of paper, gets to write one sentence on what feature would revolutionize or impact BO3 significantly, and put it in the box. What would your paper look like?


    0 0

    OUHATEME wrote:

     

    you really don't get it --- I can control the outcome of some core game modes by trolling them as well and if I stooped to that level I should get avoided and reported.....

    You also stated that you mocked them with your comments how does that fit in ? Removing the mics next.

    you purposely went in to try and ruin others gaming experiences for your personal experiment that proves absolutely nothing except that you were a troll...

    making points also has to do with how you conduct yourself and get them across , becoming part of the problem is never the way to do it.

     

    you can say whatever you want and try to justify it any way you want to yourself ,, bottom line you became part of the problem for your own amusement ...

     

    Don't nut ruin the game for those of us that play within the spirit of the game.

     

    Drops mic and leaves, this conversation is over.

    it was a 4 game experiment . my lord. i just wanted to see for myself which of the 2 evils is worse and

    for sure being able to ACTUALLY affect my opponents physically by shooting them from a distance and keeping them weak is wayyyyy more worse then i shoot them and it hits me.

    you stated in core you could do some things that would negatively affect the "game" in this situation i can currently affect the "players themselves"

     

    therefor i conclude that ricochet is the far less of the 2 evils.  I also did this on MW2  and since it was just ricochet noone even noticed!!!!

    with out ricochet i can actually affect your KD and stats.

    Relax Big guy


    0 0

    Hi Frankyland,

     

     

    We are very sorry to hear you are experiencing an issue with Night Fall.  We would like to resolve this for you immediately.  Please give us a call at 1-844-Help-EON for further assistance.

     

    Kind regards ^AH


    0 0

    Yeah, no one talks anymore.


    0 0

    Of all DLCs I ever buy for games, I always think I wasted my money. That was except Black Ops 1. Black Ops 1 brought exceptional zombies and I was more than thrilled to purchase the DLCs. Let us not forget that DLC 4 included 5 zombie maps: Moon, Nacht Der Untoten, Zombie Veruckt, Shi-no-Numa, and Der-Reise. In addition, 4 mp maps. If they make the zombies awesome, and possibly include more than one zombie map, I'll gladly buy the DLC if I get the game.


    0 0

    I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I seriously doubt it, this has been a problem for months. That's some try hard phone tech feeding you bs...imo


    0 0

    Correct, I had no issues when running on Windows 8.

     

    I tried verifying the integrity of the cache the other day, did it again for good measure this afternoon; no help.

     

    Also set it to run in compatibility mode for Windows 8. Also no help


older | 1 | .... | 634 | 635 | (Page 636) | 637 | 638 | .... | 832 | newer